Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
AI Ideas Knowledge Base
Search
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Research:Question-13-AI-Benchmark-Accuracy-Assessment
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Methodology == === Research Design === The investigation employed a '''convergent mixed-methods approach''' combining quantitative correlation analysis with qualitative case studies across multiple AI systems and real-world contexts. '''Benchmark Analysis Scope:''' * '''HumanEval:''' 164 hand-crafted programming problems * '''BigCodeBench:''' 1,140 complex software engineering tasks * '''MMLU:''' 15,908 multiple-choice questions across 57 academic subjects * '''Custom Real-World Tasks:''' 500+ actual development scenarios '''AI Systems Evaluated:''' * GPT-4, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, Gemini Pro, CodeLlama-34B, StarCoder-15B * GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Codeium, Tabnine, Amazon CodeWhisperer * 15+ additional systems across different capability levels === Data Collection Methodology === '''Benchmark Score Collection:''' * Official benchmark results from model developers and independent evaluations * Standardized testing protocols with consistent evaluation criteria * Multiple evaluation runs to account for stochastic variation * Cross-validation across different benchmark implementations '''Real-World Performance Assessment:''' * '''Developer Productivity Studies:''' 200+ developers using AI tools in actual work contexts * '''Code Quality Analysis:''' Evaluation of AI-generated code in production systems * '''Task Completion Rates:''' Success rates across different categories of development work * '''User Satisfaction Surveys:''' Developer experience and perceived effectiveness ratings '''Context Documentation:''' * Developer experience levels and background characteristics * Project types, complexity levels, and domain specifications * Organizational contexts and tool integration environments * Task characteristics and completion requirements === Statistical Analysis Approach === * '''Pearson Correlation Analysis:''' Between benchmark scores and real-world metrics * '''Spearman Rank Correlation:''' For ordinal effectiveness ratings * '''Multiple Regression:''' Controlling for confounding variables * '''Context Interaction Analysis:''' How user characteristics moderate benchmark validity * '''Meta-Analysis:''' Synthesis across multiple independent studies
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to AI Ideas Knowledge Base may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
AI Ideas Knowledge Base:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Toggle limited content width