Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
AI Ideas Knowledge Base
Search
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Idea:Baumol's Cost Disease and the Productivity Paradox
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Idea |type=person/economist |id=20250812-1356-baumol-cost-disease-productivity |created=2025-08-12T13:56:00Z |source_type=journal |source_title=Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis |source_authors=William J. Baumol |source_year=1967 |links=20250812-1355-schumpeter-creative-destruction-deflation }} = Baumol's Cost Disease and the Productivity Paradox = == Core Perspective == William Baumol identified a fundamental asymmetry in how technological progress affects different sectors: while manufacturing becomes increasingly productive, many services remain labor-intensive, creating a "cost disease" that drives inflation in service sectors even as goods become cheaper. == The Two-Sector Model == === Progressive Sector (Manufacturing/Tech) === * Rapid productivity growth through automation * Falling unit costs and prices * Decreasing employment share * Subject to technological deflation === Stagnant Sector (Services) === * Limited productivity growth * Rising relative costs * Increasing employment share * Driver of service inflation == Key Insights on Value and Deflation == === The Paradox of Relative Prices === * '''Goods get cheaper''': Technology drives down manufacturing costs * '''Services get expensive''': Human labor cannot be easily automated * '''Overall inflation persists''': Service costs outweigh goods deflation * '''GDP misleading''': Monetary measures miss utility improvements === Impact on Stakeholders === #### Consumer Welfare * Mixed blessing: cheap electronics, expensive healthcare * Quality of life improvements not captured in price indices * Income increasingly spent on services * "More stuff, less service" consumption pattern #### Business Valuations * Tech companies achieve high valuations through scalability * Service businesses face margin compression * Traditional metrics fail to capture productivity gains * Winner-take-all dynamics in progressive sectors #### Government Policy * Public services subject to cost disease (education, healthcare) * Budget pressures despite technological progress * Difficulty funding labor-intensive public goods * Tax base shifts as goods sector shrinks #### Productivity Measurements * Aggregate productivity appears to stagnate * Service sector drags down averages * Quality improvements unmeasured * "Productivity paradox" emerges == The Deflation-Inflation Dance == Baumol explains why we see both deflation and inflation: # '''Technological goods''': Exponential price decreases # '''Human services''': Steady price increases # '''Wage equalization''': Service wages must match manufacturing # '''Relative price shifts''': Services become luxury goods == Modern Applications == === Digital Economy Examples === * '''Software''': Near-zero marginal cost (progressive) * '''Healthcare''': Still requires human touch (stagnant) * '''Education''': Online learning vs. traditional (mixed) * '''Entertainment''': Streaming vs. live performance === Policy Implications === Baumol's framework suggests: * Universal basic services may become necessary * Progressive taxation on tech profits logical * Service automation is the key frontier * GDP alternatives needed for welfare measurement == Critical Insight == "The very progress of the technologically progressive sectors inevitably makes the costs of the stagnant sectors rise relative to the economy as a whole." == Connection to Technological Deflation == Baumol's cost disease explains why technological deflation doesn't eliminate inflation: * Productivity gains concentrated in goods * Services absorb displaced labor * Relative prices shift dramatically * Monetary policy becomes complex == Implications for Stakeholders == === For Businesses === * Service differentiation becomes crucial * Automation imperative where possible * Hybrid models emerge (tech-enabled services) * Scale economies determine survival === For Consumers === * Budget allocation shifts over time * Access to goods democratizes * Service quality becomes luxury * Time becomes more valuable than things === For Policymakers === * Traditional inflation measures inadequate * Service provision increasingly challenging * Income inequality amplified * New social contracts needed [[Category:Person/Economist]] [[Category:Baumol]] [[Category:Cost Disease]] [[Category:Productivity]] [[Category:Services]] [[Category:Inflation]] [[Category:Wage Dynamics]] [[Category:Gdp Productivity]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to AI Ideas Knowledge Base may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
AI Ideas Knowledge Base:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Template used on this page:
Template:Idea
(
edit
)
Toggle limited content width